Powers Are On The Books
BC's New Fire Safety AMPs: Up to $50,000, But No One Has Been Fined Yet
The Office of the Fire Commissioner now has the power to impose administrative monetary penalties of up to $50,000 on a corporation for failing to comply with fire safety orders or specific obligations under the Fire Safety Act. As of March 2026, no public record shows these penalties being used.
The new Fire Safety Act came into force on August 1, 2024, the first substantial overhaul of BC's fire safety legislation since 1979. The change that matters for operators is administrative monetary penalties: up to $25,000 for an individual and $50,000 for a corporation. Each day of continuing non-compliance after an order is ignored can attract a separate penalty, each up to the maximum. Three weeks of accumulated daily penalties at the corporate maximum reaches seven figures.
Before August 2024, that kind of penalty didn't exist at the provincial level. Fire code violations went through the courts, which meant slow timelines and uncertain outcomes, with municipalities carrying most of the enforcement load. The AMP system changes that. It gives the OFC a tool that works more like a parking ticket than a criminal prosecution: issued directly, no courtroom required.
The first penalties haven't landed yet
| Date | What changed |
|---|---|
| Aug 2024 | Fire Safety Act in force; AMP powers created ($25,000 individual / $50,000 corporate) |
| Dec 2025 | OFC publishes penalty policy and procedures |
| Mar 2026 | No public AMP register or publicly disclosed penalties found, ~20 months in |
The regime has been in force for nearly 20 months. Based on public sources available as of March 2026, no AMP register has appeared. The OFC's 2024 annual report does not publish enforcement metrics such as orders issued or penalties levied at the provincial level. Whether that means no AMPs have been issued or they simply haven't been disclosed isn't clear. Either way, the first wave of penalties under this system is either very small or still coming.
The legislation replaced a statute that had gone 45 years without a major update, and the OFC did not take on this power to leave it on the shelf.
Why BC, and why now
The context matters for BC operators: the province has 32% more structural fires per capita than Ontario. In 2021, BC recorded 785 structural fires per million residents; Ontario recorded 594.1 Ontario's structural fire count dropped 45% between 2005 and 2021 (from 15,490 to 8,450). BC's rose 26% over the same period (from 3,124 to 3,928).
| Province | 2005 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| British Columbia | 3,124 | 3,928 |
| Ontario | 15,490 | 8,450 |
One likely explanation is enforcement intensity, and the new Fire Safety Act gives BC a tool to move in that direction.
The scale of the problem is real. In 2024, BC recorded 12,072 fires with total losses exceeding $663 million, and structure fires accounted for 4,063 of them. For residential structure fires, cooking equipment accounts for roughly 25% of ignition sources, and smokers' materials account for a similar share, both squarely within what a functioning fire safety plan addresses.
What fire inspectors actually write orders for
The penalty doesn't follow a fire. It follows non-compliance with an inspector's order or a failure to provide requested records. The first operators to receive an AMP probably won't be the ones who had a kitchen fire. They'll be the ones who got a routine inspection, received an order to fix something, and didn't move on it.
The things that trigger orders are ordinary: fire alarm test certificates not current, hood suppression systems with no maintenance record, exit routes partially blocked, a fire safety plan that doesn't match the current layout. None of these are expensive to fix. All of them are expensive to ignore under the new per-day penalty clock.
The fire safety plan question
Fire safety plans are consistently among the most out-of-date documents inspectors encounter. Evacuation routes that no longer match the floor layout, extinguisher service dates that have passed, and responsibility assignments naming former staff are all recurring findings.
Under the BC Fire Code, certain occupancies including assembly uses (restaurants and bars) are required to have a fire safety plan on site and kept current, available to the fire department on request. Hotels may have similar obligations as buildings required to have a fire alarm system. None of that is new. What's new is the consequence for having it out of date or missing entirely.
The fire plan sitting unreviewed in the back office and the expired extinguisher behind the bar were always violations. After an inspector writes an order to fix them, they become potential AMP violations carrying penalties of up to $50,000 for a corporation, with each day of continued non-compliance counted separately.
Based on available public sources as of March 2026, the OFC does not appear to have issued an AMP yet. The OFC published its penalty procedures in December 2025, which puts the machinery for the first penalties in place.
-
Duty Room analysis of Statistics Canada Table 35-10-0192-01 (National Fire Information Database), 2005-2021, using 2021 Census of Population denominators (BC 5,000,879; Ontario 14,223,942). Source data at statcan.gc.ca.
This briefing is based on sources available at publication and is for general information only. It doesn't constitute legal advice. For advice on your specific situation, consult a qualified professional.
Advice from your consultant, action from your sites.
BC Fire Code penalties run up to $50,000 per day. Duty Room keeps your fire safety plan evidence current and aligned with your consultant between visits.